• layzerjeyt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    5·
    8 个月前

    I heard of a test that makes sense, minimally. If you reverse the vote of every single person, the opposite party should win. Apparently there are ways of organizing it where that isn’t the case.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      2·
      8 个月前

      To make aure I understand, you mean that if you reverse the vote of every district the state should see the opposite party winning?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      1·
      8 个月前

      That only works if there are only two parties. I’d prefer a solution that works with electoral reform, not against it.

      • layzerjeyt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        1·
        8 个月前

        but since there are 2 parties it complies with your request of

        a rigorous definition of gerrymandering that isn’t just “I know it when I see it.”