TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoSay Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagatewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square261linkfedilinkarrow-up1624arrow-down110
arrow-up1614arrow-down1external-linkSay Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagatewww.vice.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square261linkfedilink
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.
minus-squareFrezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoIf there’s higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density. We’ve pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.
I would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.
If there’s higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density.
We’ve pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.