• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Given that this would lead to slightly less arrests but significantly more deaths, I’m not sure how this would be considered a win.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago
      1. It would lead to significantly less arrests if they needed double or triple the agents to conduct them “safely”.
      2. More people will die only if agents or their victims start shooting on general principle. In either case, that’s a backslide that isn’t really a consequence of putting more agents on one person.
      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        More people will die only if agents or their victims start shooting on general principle

        What do you think is going to happen when dozens of agents start raiding homes without a warrant?