cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/23396300

show transcript

nickyflowers posts:

it would be cool if websites let you be an adult on them. the advertisers and payment processors need everything to be Family Friendly though and their definitions of family and friendly are absolutely fucked. but since they’re in charge of the Internet now, no one is allowed to be an adult. tiktokers say things like “unalive” and “seggs” because they know death and sex are too adult for online. online is for idiot babies only now because they’re easier to market to

nickyflowers replies:
oh im sorry you’re a trans adult? super ban. you are super banned for life. you have upset Visa’s feelings. Mastercard is throwing up in the corner. how could you do this to Google Ads?

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    3·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say, if I’m being honest.

    I will say though that having sex and being pro-sex are two extremely different things, and the existence of one does not in any way imply the existence of the other.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      1·
      1 hour ago

      I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say, if I’m being honest.

      Advertisers didn’t change queer people, queer people changed advertisers.

      I will say though that having sex and being pro-sex are two extremely different things, and the existence of one does not in any way imply the existence of the other.

      How can someone have lots of sex without being pro-sex? You’re incorrectly conflating the idea of doing sexual things in general and the idea of doing sexual things in public; most Pride events are less overtly sexual now than they were in the past, but that’s not a reduction to the original goals of Pride.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        1·
        43 minutes ago

        Advertisers didn’t change queer people, queer people changed advertisers.

        You’re not immune to marketing and conditioning. It’s not a one-way street, it’s two-way.

        How can someone have lots of sex without being pro-sex?

        I dunno, maybe ask the Catholic Church, or the Mormon Church, or any other famously anti-sex organization that promotes heavy breeding but still uses harmful shame tied to sex as a a means of control?

        You’re incorrectly conflating the idea of doing sexual things in general and the idea of doing sexual things in public; most Pride events are less overtly sexual now than they were in the past, but that’s not a reduction to the original goals of Pride.

        No, I’m not. You’re conflating being pro-sex with being sexually active.