I’m feeling so uneasy with everything I’ve been seeing. I keep thinking about what we will be this time next year, and if shit hits the fan, what is your plan? I’m queer and was politically active in 2020, so I would potentially be considered a political enemy.

The only blueprint I can think of is what you do in an active shooter situation; Flee, Hide, Fight.

I know there’s that romantic notion of “don’t be a coward, get out and protest”, but I remember the brutality of the 2020 protests firsthand, and even then I thought “thank god I’m going toe to toe with the CPD and not the CCP”. Next time is going to be different. The president now has authority to send drone strikes. Protests and riots don’t stand a chance agains missiles and live rounds.

Flee- I have an Uncle in Montreal who my family could potentially use as a way to at least temporarily escape the chaos. The hope I’d have is that Canada and other countries would accept American refugees, however that’s not a guarantee.

Hide- If borders are closed, lay low and move away from major cities if possible. If civil war breaks out, try to get away from the violence even if you think your side will win. Todays losers may be tomorrows victors.

Fight- If cellular data/ social media algorithms can keep track of you, and surveillance can make sure there’s no movement, this would be the last resort of desperation. I guess if possible try to either find a group for safety in numbers, or conversely go guerrilla as groups of resistance would make easy targets.

Sorry my mind is running and I’m getting scared.

  • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t underestimate the US military, as an ally. They are primarily younger, and the upper echelons are educated and all take their oath very seriously, to defend the Constitution, from enemies foreign and domestic. Of course there will be factions that will stick to Trump, like certain national guards, but that will fracture command and weaken our ability to react internationally. The military understand those implications, the potential literal end of the world. In the end, they push the button, not the president. The lower ranks have no desire to fight American civilians either, it’s antithetical to everything they are taught, and the age range is generally people in their 20’s and 30’s.I trust a Marine, a soldier, an airman, a seaman heheh, coast guard too, oh and the spacemen, way more than a cop, to do the right thing.

    A vet.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Based on the judges he appointed it doesn’t really matter what Trump says

      Edit: oh my god. The article is from 2016. He’s done the exact opposite for gay rights

      • mydude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, the Dems gambled in 2016, regard the supreme court judges, and lost. Big time… The people will pay the price… Weird that the oligarchs win no matter what happens…

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So cheap to always both sides it. The “oligarchs”. Do you guys have a script you pass around? You guys can’t seem to have any original thoughts

          • mydude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you really think that the Dems are so much better, why don’t people have nice things in California? The dems have super majority there for many years…? Just bad luck?

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Depends. By what metric? It’s the fifth largest economy in the world with the top literacy rate in the nation. What are you comparing it to? Mississippi? I need more than but muh California!!!

              • mydude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Having m4a, affordable housing, 25$ mimimum wage, helping the homeless, food programs. Anything that helps the poor…

  • Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d like to try to assuage your fears regarding a protest meeting missiles or drone strikes. Yes, the President can order drone strikes with impunity. It’s been that way since the first use of drones, early as the Obama era (maybe earlier, but I was a bit young then).

    However, this does not apply to US soil. One of the benefits of state sovereignty is that federal armed forces can’t operate on US soil. National guard gets involved, at the governor’s request, but they don’t have missiles or drones. Police are barbaric, but they also don’t have missiles or drones.

    So I don’t think we’d see much of an escalation in terms of weapons of violence with regards to protests when compared to 2020.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If he declares it an official act, then it’s not illegal. Drone strikes are pretty official.

      SCOTUS fucked up super-sized

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        He can order it all he wants, but that doesn’t mean any branch of the military has to actually carry out an obviously illegal order. All it means is that he theoretically “can’t” get prosecuted for trying.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Soldiers swear an oath to the Constitution to not commit illegal orders, regardless of who orders them.

          The issue is that the president cant issue illegal orders anymore. Since hes the commander in chief of the military, his orders are an “official act,” i.e constitutional.

          The supreme court has said that the president can order military executions of anyone at all and the military can no longer legally refuse. The above is constitutional, because the people who decide what is constitutional said it is.

          • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            And a huge proportion doesn’t.

            Dont underestimate how many people join the military at 18 for financial/career reasons and often end up living overseas and meeting people from different backgrounds. It’s not as conservative as people might imagine.

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I know that many do not, but I have no idea what the actual proportions would be. Polls are iffy.

  • Bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Celebrate and hope that he sticks to his word on ending the war in Ukraine (of course I don’t trust him or any other politician, but at least there will be a slight hope, as compared to Biden who will 100% continue the slaughter…)

    • meep_launcher@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think the reason I don’t follow that idea is that it sounds so similar to Neville Chamberlain’s “Peace for our Time”. The slaughter would just be put on pause, but would last longer and become more dangerous in 2 years time.

      I see a difference between that and the handling of Gaza, which Trump would very much continue supporting Israel on. He wouldn’t put American troops on the ground, but he’s been saying his peace plan is for Israel to “get the job done”. This is very much what we did in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we saw how that played out. I understand there is a belief that stopping support for Israel means the death of Israel, but with BB, he is only accelerating this by continued genocide of Palestinians.

      There are idealists (and I will fully admit some anti-semites) who would love to see the end of a Jewish state, and there are those who would look for a two state solution. Trump and BB have made it clear that they are not for a two state solution and are pushing for complete annihilation of the Palestinian people. Trump is not a peacemaker.

      • Bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The slaughter would just be put on pause, but would last longer and become more dangerous in 2 years time.

        This may or may not happen, nobody can predict the future.
        That’s why I said “there will be a slight chance”.
        With Biden the war will go on for who knows how much time, hundreds of thousands if not millions more people will die for sure and the chance for peace in the foreseeable future is 0. With Trump it’s >0. So I sure hope he will win.

        … Palestine/Israel …

        That’s a topic for another discussion really… Both candidates will probably continue that war, but one will also continue the war in Ukraine, while another one promises to finish it.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This may or may not happen, nobody can predict the future.

          bullshit. you’re just happy to throw ukraine to the wolves.

          • Bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nah, I’m just happy that people there might stop being massacred.
            Now I know that’s not a popular opinion for the last two years, and everybody thinks it’s OK and every Ukrainian should die, but I still think killing people who done you no harm is not okay.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nah, I’m just happy that people there might stop being massacred.

              in no way will appeasing putin stop the massacre. bullies don’t back down until socked in the face

              • Bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Negotiations are the only realistic way to end the war, and this is exactly what Trump is saying he will do - force both sides to negotiate.
                I don’t really care who it is “appeasing”, I want people stop being murdered.

                • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  if you actually care about people, stopping the russian INVASION is all you should care about.

                  Your supposed concern is sick.