einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agothat about 1/1000 of your phones RF power output, and the distance is 384400kmsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1255arrow-down13
arrow-up1252arrow-down1imagethat about 1/1000 of your phones RF power output, and the distance is 384400kmsh.itjust.workseinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarezaphod@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 day agoIt’s easy, you just need a big antenna, low noise receiver (just cool it) for low bandwidth (keeps noise power low) and no interferers in the same frequency band.
minus-squareTrollception@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·58 minutes agoPerfect. Now put those on cell phones and make it fit in your pocket.
minus-squarezaphod@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·22 hours agoShow me a non-directional antenna.
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·32 minutes agohttps://enterprisecontrol.co.uk/tci-product/non-directional-antennas/
minus-squarezaphod@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 minutes agoJust because you call it non-directional doesn’t mean it is. They all have gain compared to a theoretical isotropic antenna.
It’s easy, you just need a big antenna, low noise receiver (just cool it) for low bandwidth (keeps noise power low) and no interferers in the same frequency band.
Perfect. Now put those on cell phones and make it fit in your pocket.
*directional antenna
Show me a non-directional antenna.
https://enterprisecontrol.co.uk/tci-product/non-directional-antennas/
Just because you call it non-directional doesn’t mean it is. They all have gain compared to a theoretical isotropic antenna.
Shrimple as that
It’s almost too easy