• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    On an unrelated notes, a huge fraction of oceanic microplastics is from car tyres. Driving is a number one source of oceanic microplastic.

      • badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Since this is a science community, can I ask what studies directly link these microplastics to the specific adverse affects?

        I see a lot of “BPA microplastics are hormone disruptors” and “microplastics found in placentas!” Etc … ok, but are they the same microplastics in these studies?

        It sounds like when everyone puts scarequotes around “chemicals”…

      • Verat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        tbf they are only heavier because they are making them SUVs instead of coupes or sedans and trying to convince people that a 150 mile range isnt long enough for them as if they wont just plug it back in when they get home or as if they actually commute 75 miles each way. God forbid they have to wait for it to charge. Electric vehicles have the potential to be the same weight or lighter but car companies all suck.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah, if they built cars people don’t want with batteries smaller than people want to buy, the wheels could just be as bad as normal cars.

          If everyone had switched to driving corollas and civics in the year 1990, we would have less micro plastics and a way cooler environment but… people hate each other and don’t give a fuck.