wake up
get up
get out there

me if hayfever didn’t exist:

This might be getting into the weeds a little, but to me, “bottle of water” implies a single-use bottle already filled with water, while “water bottle” implies a bottle that is made to be (re)filled with water

Wow, TIL, thanks for the info!

Oh okay, fair enough. Out of interest, what does Jagex have against the Brits?

Nope, just straight up blocked

I tried to follow that link and it seems Cloudflare blocked me. Don’t suppose you know who I’d need to talk to to resolve that would you?

For UK general elections (what we call elections to Parliament, our national legislature), the UK is divided into 650 constituencies, each of which elect one MP by FPTP. There is no party-list component.

The situation is different for other elections:

• STV: used in all Northern Ireland elections (except general elections), Scottish local elections, and Welsh local elections starting from 2027, subject to the council choosing to do so itself
• AMS (Additional Member System): used for elections to the Scottish Parliament, Senedd (Welsh Parliament), and Greater London Assembly
• Closed Party List: used to elect the Senedd starting from 2026, and formerly used for elections to the European Parliament prior to Brexit
• FPTP: used in all other elections

AMS is what we call MMP. Assemblies elected by AMS are composed of some single-member seats elected by FPTP which are then grouped into larger regions, each of which are allocated a certain number of seats to be used for the proportional component. These also use closed party lists, and is probably where the idea that our FPTP system is FPTP + party lists. It’s not: FPTP is exactly the same in the UK as it is in the US. If there’s any component on top of that, we call it AMS.

I turn 29 in a few months and scored 2. I would not be surprised if I’ve forgotten an instance of using a typewriter or listening to a boombox outside though.

Eiselin Burchelli Meijal Hulkenberg has entered the chat

The staffers who resigned were all originally employees of the United States Digital Service, a technology unit established during President Obama’s second term in 2014. The unit was renamed and reorganized in January via executive order by Trump into the Musk-headed DOGE.

In my experience, people who like cock and balls generally like looking at cock and balls in porn, if only for help fantasising about playing with said cock and balls. Dressing them up makes them less sexual and more humourous, which someone might be into in the same way as playing “got your nose” with your arse cheeks. Though it’s only funny for a split second when you’re not expecting it, then you actually have to remove the costume in order to access the cock and balls.

I think it’s because most of those folks don’t want to see other people’s Johnsons.

I mean… Men who like men exist, though I say that as a pan-guy that doesn’t really seek out penis. Not repulsed, they just seem boring. Seeing them dressed up is actually funny and interesting until I get bored

Similar interface, different values. Not to say that the one in the article isn’t absolutely egregious as well though, so my point only really matters if you care about OP’s image specifically.

Whatever is in the background looks like they have a nice arse

I’m not a trans person, but I’m pretty sure that “assigned X at birth” refers to whatever gender is assigned on one’s birth certificate.

I still see it sometimes when connecting my Steam Deck to my TV

[update: this was a misunderstanding]

Here’s the update for convenience

(… saw this on my feed, only just thought to check the community itself to see if there was another post, my bad)

P E R S O N A 🔫

Also from the UK (also Manchester actually, literally on the Metrolink right now). I also have no idea what that person said.