That’s true, but there are also massive economies of scale when you can afford the big Nvidia gpus and share them among many people.

I agree. I use openrouter myself.

In general I agree with you, but llms are the one exception where it’s not practical and not cost effective to run them locally. If you want to use them, the better option is by far to pay someone for the service.

There are lots of countries where you need to bribe government officials in order to achieve the simple things. The US is fortunately still far from that level.

I completely agree with you. I think what the US needs is more readily available AND relatively healthy food options. As a European, walking through the isles of an American grocery shop is utterly depressing.

I don’t, but I do have bypass paywalls clean. Sorry, I didn’t realize CNN had subscriber-only content.

CNN, really?

Reading the paper, exercise alone had no effect on these “biological clocks”. So, the results are promising, but given the lackluster results of the trial on other outcomes (blood pressure, mortality, falls, etc.), I’d be cautious before jumping to conclusions.

I think the main question is how exercise alone compares to exercise +supplements. If I have time later I’ll try to dig into the paper.

dupe

When you’re a government, you need a little more process to ensure things are done well (moderation, security, …). Even something simple like that could take valuable time from quite a few people.

Sad but unfortunately fairly justified. Hard to justify spending public money on 3,500 users.

Just because it’s dangerous and not always fun doesn’t make it a “mission”. Exactly like when some rich schmuck pays 150k to climb Everest.

Can we stop calling it a “mission”? This is an expensive vacation for billionaires, not a scientific endeavor.

Rust, haskell, python, c++ are all interesting choices. I would argue that c# is too close to what you already know to be interesting.

If I were you though, I’d pick a project first, then decide what language makes sense for it.

I don’t understand why they don’t use a second model to detect falsehoods instead of trying to fix it in the original LLM?