11·
8 days agoEven if it were true, Meg looks like a dehydrated horse these days.
Wigners_friend
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: June 7th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
including “indigo”. Seriously? I am colourblind, even I know that’s bullshit.
Come on! Do it bigly this time bibi
3·1 month agoIt’s the only driver that can render Cthulu.
5·1 month agoDon’t worry about, super magic AGI will solve all problems. Sam Altman said so.
151·2 months agoUnderrated comment. However, it’s never lupus.
24·2 months agoHe is desperate that people regard him as a deep and serious thinker. The trouble is, no interesting thought has ever crossed his mind. This is the reason for his pathetic hatred of academics. His university professors rightly saw a useless dweeb with an outrageous sense of self regard.
2·2 months agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Untestable universes is not a rejoinder to “stop thinking” it’s just another way to achieve it
The “solutions” are not out of reach. Just do the experiment more than once, like any statistical theory.
The moon thing: yes because it was hard to get to, not impossible in principle. If the moon was in a parallel universe your analogy wouldn’t be irrelevant.
6·3 months agoIt wouldn’t work, even in principle. They want to force you to live by their lunacy. It would be totally pointless if they couldn’t exert power over the unwilling.
“It’s not as pop-sci as painted” anyway here’s some pop-sci to justify it…
The reply to the energy problem is hilarious. These universes that differ by a single quantum event have radically different energy totals. Science!
Great answer, but it unfortunately is taken seriously. The reason is because it is an “end of the road” hypothesis. It tells you all the weirdness is fundamental and no further thought is required. Just like good old Copenhagen. The unfalsifiability is a virtue here, it’s a complete explanatin without the messy testing. Now stop thinking, shut up, and calculate.
If we sufficiently torture the word “simplest”.
It’s stronger than a classical one, yes. But Einstein’s description is mocking the idea of entanglement as an active link that allows distant states to be changed by local actions.
Positrons don’t move backwards in time in any physical sense. Their mathematical representation is like an electron with a negative time coordinate but this is physically dubious because it fails in curved spacetimes. Electron-positron pairs are entangled because they are correlated by the process that created the pair. Entanglement is just a correlation, not some magical link.
On it’s own, it doesn’t matter at all. You can’t protest against those who don’t recognise your humanity. The exact lesson from apartheid here in south Africa. There is no peaceful way to oppose ideologies based on violence.