I am happy that his brother continues the channel in the spirit of Paul.
I am happy that his brother continues the channel in the spirit of Paul.
Yeah they developed it because they feared the Makarov used before was not beefy enough.
You guys making fun but I say the Mercury capsule really had a vaguely similar shock absorber.
Not only that he also had a pistol with him.
deleted by creator
My first thought, luckily a virus and not a prion disease. Still sucks.
Using this with Steam to prevent games from updating.
Yes, I think I was wrong with my assumption.
Is muscle tissue even infectious? (Especially when grown from a few cells) Don’t you need to eat some brain or spinal cord?
Strangely enough, in my bubble it is quite descent. People often posting interesting research and advances in the field.
Man it is not even HSE. The ethical sourcing of human tissue and the proper documentation of said. And all the bribes for the review and governance committees.
That is about the experience I have. I asked it for factual information in the field I work at. It didn’t gave correct answers. Or, it gave working protocols which were strange and would not be successful.
Can this have an influence on the security of certain cryptographic functions?
You know they hit about within a half inch circle at 55 yards. That is with iron sights and the weapon not supported! This is really remarkable. If my top of the head calculation is correct this is about 1 MOA. Better than the hardware error alone of older/ lower end guns.
It is still super boring to watch however.
The rule is you have to hold it single handed. Then everything follows logic, you need to have the arm fully extended to be more stable. You need to keep your eye behind the iron sights. etc. Try it out yourself, extend your arm and see if you can find a more stable position.
No, that is not true, these are fundamentally single shot bolt action rifles. Maybe like a race bike to a normal street bike. The additional precision and adjustability are no use to a normal shooter but they are not more complicated to handle.
Do you really think the CEOs of big pharma don’t know they themselves have a 20% chance to die of cancer? (Not to speak of their relatives). Would the selfish and rich big pharma company leader not do everything to prevent its early death?
Spending one billion on breast cancer drug discovery/ development would probably lead to one more drug which increases survival by 10-20%. Or if spend on fundamental research it would lead to a lot of additional knowledge. Which might lead in about 10 years (and a few billions more) to a few drugs which increase survival a further 30-40 %.
No clue what Amazon is using. The one I have access to gave a sane answer.
Man, I would be so worried about impurities and side reactions. A good example is the recalls of drugs because of nitrosamine contamination. If stuff like this already happens to the experts.
And what is with the whole galenics side? How to make sure the absorption is about right…