
Crazy how much that 1.5% could have changed
Crazy how much that 1.5% could have changed
Somehow it feels like this whole essay could be summarized in a single paragraph of, say, 3 proper sentences
Wasn’t STEAM supposed to be something specific, not a replacement of STEM? Idk, I just know the acronym because Angela Collier did a video.
Plenty of stuff that works much better for white guys that speak English and with the right accent, because that’s who they are mostly trained on (image/speech recognition, spell check and translation, lots of medical stuff but that’s not very tech). Not sure about straight.
Edit: oh the image said cis, not straight. That’s easier.
At least half of all US voters is okay with all this, no?
The only one that feels like a statement is leaving out one of L, G, B or T. But even then, honest mistakes aren’t a big deal.
The original had a sheep instead of Garfield
Computer science: pi is O(1)
Canon differential geometer hair
I see what you’re going for re: automation, but calling this a genocide seems weird to me. Then scaling down cattle farming would also be genocide. There’s no horse culture that got eradicated, just less breeding.
I suddenly understand the Simpsons joke. Cool track.
Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere.
it’s AI
Looks a lot larger than A1 tbh
Is this an old image or do people actually want to do a men’s health month in the same month as Pride?
Incompleteness means that maybe it’s actually impossible to prove or disprove the Riemann hypothesis, or whether P=NP. I think that’s a big deal. Maybe the fact that there are meaningful results shown to be unprovable (like axiom of choice) is more satisfying?
Also I hope it’s fake because that’s the tiniest aquarium and there’s no plants.
There’s another way?