Yes but it’s self-fulfilling because I’m less interested in things that I’m bad at

Jim Jordan, the rapist protector? The Jim Jordan that protected the rapist OSU coach? That Jim Jordan?

Who do you think makes the list? Fucking idiot.

lol you don’t even have argument, you’re just foaming at the mouth and spouting nonsensical talking points that have been debunked over and over again.

Hilarious 😂🤣😂🤣 just listen to yourself

Literally every single statement you made includes an assumption that the work wasn’t checked and that nobody has any idea what it changed.

Yes, slop exists, but one-shotting without review is not how most people use the tools.

It sounds more like you didn’t even read his comment and are just rabidly spewing anti-AI talking points instead of participating in the discussion.

The environmental implications of the data centers fuelling the LLMs will undoubtedly end more lives than nuclear weapons ever have

No Man’s Sky doesn’t sound like thr game you’re looking for. Nothing in this universe is crafted to be interesting – there is no exploring every corner of the world to find the last secret interaction, because there are no setpieces.

Everything is generated. There are no real quests, or characters, or stories, there is only you and your ship and the bases you build along the way. You can create your own stories, but you will not be experiencing storytelling.

It’s morrowind without the cities or people or combat. There are fun parts to it, but I don’t think the things that you look for in games are what you’ll find here, based on the other games you listed.

Because they put $1B into refurbishing MSG ~15 years ago

Ha, I just assumed it was an intentional typo for HRT

Good luck fitting one of those in a fucking pillowcase

I may only have 10 years of experience coding but I can still see how shitty the output is, and even listed an example.

Then you should be putting more time into your tools. Nobody uses a blank of wood to hammer something, and then decides 'wow, hammers aren’t good tools," you’re just using a shit hammer.

And, to be clear, I work in a full-stack environment and regularly generate HTML and CSS without the issue you mentioned… you can’t just pull a frontier model without any skills/rules/mcps and expect it to just do the work. You need design docs and thorough rules for your environment. An LLM is a tool, not a developer.

Cryptographic high security stuff though? There’s no way in hell that thing isn’t going to introduce a security risk.

That’s totally fair. They can only get ~75% of the way there on crypto stuff rn. Amazing at the other side, though (pen testing)

Hi 👋 I am a professional programmer with 35 years of experience and I believe coding by hand has been obsolete for ~6mo, now, maaaaaybe up to a year. You want someone with experience driving the car, but I haven’t hand-written more than maybe 100 lines of code professionally in several months. If anything, I waited too long.

most politicians say stuff on video nowadays and not really writing articles anymore since the invention of the radio pretty much

…what?

There’s significantly less air and water pollution now than the past, with the only exception being microplastics. We haven’t found many short-term impacts from that yet, though

This is a completely valid opinion, though. The products in Japanese dollar stores (in the US) are of significantly higher quality than those in dollar tree/etc.

and its code is… well, it’s not bad, so let’s quantify it as good, or good enough

If “good enough” isn’t actually good enough, why are you calling it that? Your entire argument hinges on high code quality not being high code quality. Like… yeah, of course bad code is going to lead to bad outcomes. That’s literally the entire point he’s trying to make: the tool doesn’t matter, the result does.

Linus says he only cares about quality and refuses to make a hardline rule explicitly banning LLMs in all contexts

This is… unspeakably bad

Man, genuinely… how do people not understand why nobody takes the Anti movement seriously?

It sure sounds a lot like official Cornell policy is to support sexual abusers and rapists, based on the overwhelming rate at which Cornell produces rapists and then actively defends them?

Maybe Cornell doesn’t care about real education, and only cares about teaching people how to sexually assault others and get away with it?