- 0 Posts
- 126 Comments
How does that effect their privacy/security?
2·2 天前Wait politicians were telling people to take their phones and opt-in for fundraisers? I never saw this, what was the reasoning besides “give us money pls”???
21·3 天前No it doesn’t. Taiwan is part of China, the PRC rules China.
If Trump and most Republicans lost the next elections, and this led to a violent split between Democrats and Republicans rather than Trump and the Republicans ceding power, with the Democrats ultimately pushing back the Trumpist insurrection until they fled to Long Island, where they slaughtered most people living there then claimed to rule the entire US from the island.
Trumps Republicans would not still have claim to the entire US just because he ruled for 8 years (and Republicans far longer), and wouldn’t rightfully have claim to Long Island itself. It would be an occupation of American land by a far right nationalist faction, nothing more.
You only disagree with regards to Taiwan because the west sides with the nationalist occupation in an effort to oppose the communist ruling party of China.
The ROCs(Far right nationalists) initial rise is inseparable from the PRC (Communists) as they were working together to Reunify all of China at the beginning.
After the breaking of this alliance by the ROC, purging the PRC to establish their far right nationalist base, they only lasted about 20 years, before the PRC regained far more support, resorting to the ROC ultimately retreating to the island of Tawain while the PRC continued focus on the original goal of uniting the mainland, which it achieved, and has thus ruled far more of China longer than the ROC ruled the sections they held.
By no stretch of the imagination can you claim that the ROC has rightful claim over the whole of China.
Why would China invade itself?
Xi: “If you invade Texas I’ll bomb the shit out of DC”
Trump: 😱😱😱
Comrade, abandon the alcohol, down cigs like a true based revolutionary.
Obama literally built them as and used them as concentration camps wtf are you talking about. They weren’t all encompassing resorts that Trump remodeled.
Trump also claims he’s only targeting criminals and human traffickers, the only difference is you rightfully don’t believe him, but wrongfully believe the Dems.
It’s not the same as always, it’s worse under Trump2 than it was under Biden, or even Trump1. If Kamala won, it would also be worse than Trump 1 or Biden, you just wouldn’t care. Just like you didn’t care when Biden was as bad as Trump1.
The point is not that things are always the same, the point is that both parties serve the same donors and core system and will ultimately do what the system demands of them. That’s why the Dems started pushing the same “immigration as a national security” issue, they were manufacturing consent.
The Democrats literally conceded immigration as a national security issue and changed the debate to who could solve it more efficiently in the 2024 elections.
Even before they publicly accepted the Republican framing, Obama built the concentration camps Trump was derided for during his first term.
7·7 天前I thought it might be interpreted as mean spirited which wasn’t the intention and assumed nobody had seen it yet anyway. I’ll bring it back just for you!
Did you miss the part where the US also revoked their visas? I didn’t see it in that specific article, but they were also cancelled from German appearances.
It’s not the case…it just happens sometimes? It doesn’t count when it does happen because it’s capitalism? We have to ignore when it happens because if people realized, they would be too distraught?
I genuinely don’t understand what’s doing on with this comment.
1·7 天前We won’t even stop destroying the thing we need to live and breathe in.
The whole point of all that screaming is to instill the belief that we have already achieved freedom. When you live in the most free, bestest country on earth, you aren’t likely to raise a fit.
I took it as: The OP is about honking instantly.
The top of the thread is trying to justify impatiently honking immediately. “I’m impatient and idk why you aren’t moving immediately!”
Hence my response that they could just have a slower reaction time to the light turning.
So when you say “if the lights been green long enough”
I reply about how “green long enough” is subjective and the thread is biased towards the an Immediate honk.
The original discussion is specifically about people who honk instantly.
Obviously at a certain point it’s not only acceptable but necessary as parking at a green light is a road hazard itself.
You’re just accepting the altered framing from the original example to the counter example while I’m trying to keep it grounded on the original example.
Yeah, I get it Chet, you gotta get to the frat party and you’re all jacked up on stimulants.
How does it provide any further perspective? “They actually don’t deserve their land because they were colonized by the British”?
Why would you expect the Palestinians to accept a plan to give half of their land away to a violent colonial expansionist ideology. Should Poland have peacefully given half their land to Germany to avoid the invasion? Do you really think that would work anyway, or is it just an excuse to blame the victims for their own genocide?
Edit: Also, since then Palestine has called for the partition borders to be enforced, and Israel/their allies were the ones to deny it. Israel only ever supported the plan as a means to an end, further colonial expansion.