They buy products from each other, and shut out more and more people if society.

You see the homeless drug addict on the street? They want more of that.

Oh definitely. The whole “reasoning” thing was just sending the answer back as a prompt a few times in different structures, and it was of course all billed

The stance is that chatbota aren’t essential to the economy the way smartphones or computers are.

When you send a message to a chatbot, it cuts it up to little pieces made up of a few letters, assigns numbers to them, does math, and gives you back a bunch of other numbers that it translates back to pieces and puts together into a sentence.

You pay for the chatbot by the amount of little pieces in and little pieces out. The little pieces are the tokens.

Can you just go there? Don’t you need a visa?

Was it only sending hashes of the list elements?

That’s not an abortion at the point the child has a gender, that’s just plain murder.

You can run Claude Sonnet equivalent quantised models locally on much less RAM.

Local LLMs are close to being viable. We’re almost at the point where they fit a Macbook.

What the fuck did I miss

It wasn’t pulled from Wikipedia, I am an engineering manager and thus I spend a lot of time defining technical stuff for non tech people of varying aptitudes.

But I guess you’re right, NY train of thought was that people tend to equate game engine with look and feel, while most of it is not that.

An engine is the collection of core runtime features on top of which gameplay features and assets are put on.

A 4K texture pack and a few particle effects aren’t an engine update, it used to be available through mods.

What an engine update would be for example is seamless interior cell loading, or seamless high density cell loading for example.

Or better texture streaming, so on. A better engine would mean same exact screenshots, but more FPS and less loading screens.

Yeah, that was a major WTF moment

At a 100% risk, it better, or it’s useless.

So a company can feed oil tankers to Iran and the US pays?

If the payout is small, it’s a shitty insurance and does nothing.

If the payout is big, it’s free money since you’re pretty much guaranteed to be droned.

Overstudy of religion.

Lol. You have to study it just enough to get hooked, but not enough to notice the inconsistencies.

That’s just the usual routine of externalising costs while extracting benefits, maybe it’s just a very blatant example.

600k is not a lot of money for a software team or for AI though.

One way to do that, and no joke, is to start up and participate in local barter economies.

A bunch of places I’ve lived in, especially with a large student population, would have communities where people who have surpluses of something, extra food, old furniture, can give it to people who need them.

Ask yourself the question, what can you do to fulfill a need while preempting consumption, and you have an answer.

I guess it makes coreutils vulnerable to EEE. Corps with significant stakes in Linux would be able to extend the API with proprietary functions, build ecosystems on top of that, and lock out independent development.

Imagine being unable to distribute a Linux based OS that is compatible with most of the world without proprietary age verification built in for example.

Regime changed by oil interests