• ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m an elected state official in Florida at the extremely local level. Fuck off with that. People don’t need to know my browsing history. It’s entirely possible to judge someone’s fitness by the acts they take in office alone.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s entirely possible to judge someone’s fitness by the acts they take in office alone.

      Why would I want to know their fitness after they were elected? Sorry, if you’re secretly a Nazi, I want to know before I vote for you.

      What could possibly be in your browser history that you don’t want people to see?

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        My browsing history is my business, not yours or anyone else’s. You may as well start asking for my correspondence history, a record of the content of my private conversations, etc…

        I understand the danger that bad actors posing as normal candidates pose. Trust me, I’ve dealt with it first hand. But throwing out huge swathes of otherwise qualified candidates because they aren’t willing to share every piece of their personal life is not the remedy.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          When you’re going to be given governmental powers beyond a normal citizen’s, it’s everyone’s business what sort of person you really are.

          A browser history is not every piece of a personal life.

          I am sorry, but it sounds like you have a good reason to be opposed to this.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Dude, I normally agree with you, but not on this. You’re trying to set up a purity test for office. You might not use it that way, but the Repuglicans will.

            Also do you really want to see your daughter’s entire browser history because you raised her well, and she decides to become a civil servant? Or worse, have it plastered all over the news? Think hard on that one.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              If she did something nefarious that the public should know about? Absolutely I do. I’m not why you think I would consider family a special case and I’m sorry you think that I’m that sort of hypocrite because I sure have never indicated I am.

              (Also, I don’t know why people insist on telling me they normally agree with me when they disagree with me, but it happens all the time.)

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Nah dude, I wasn’t calling you a hypocrite. I was trying to reframe it so that you could see how whatever her sexuality is would be weaponized against her. It’s a bad idea, for people that "have nothing to hide.

                Would you want the world to know all the porn you ever looked at? Cause I wouldn’t, and from what I can tell, I’m into some pretty tame shit.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I wouldn’t run for office. And if you’re worried about that sort of thing and don’t want people to know about it, maybe you shouldn’t either. Because if they learn, you’ll be in a world of shit of your own making when you could have avoided it.

                  • kevindqc@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    So let’s push normal people out of public office, and make sure to only have sociopaths who have no shame?

                    For example, I looked up a spider monkey’s vagina because a book about sexuality my partner was reading said they have large external clitoris coming out of their butt.

                    I can bet you all my wealth that it would be used by Republicans to say I’m into bestiality and a sexual deviant.

                  • ashok36@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The result of this is that the only people who can get into office are literally perfect or they’re very good at hiding their activities. You leave no room for normal people with varying levels of flaws and foibles and ‘weird’ interests to participate.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s okay, according to @ASeriesOfPoorChoices, it’s because I am “going insane.” Gotta love an ableist. (I actually have mental illness, so I always love people who use it as a weapon.)

      • Bilbo_Haggins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        What could possibly be in your browser history that you don’t want people to see?

        I’m sorry, do you live in the same world as the rest of us? Seems like half the country wants to murder gay people and thinks porn should be illegal and you can’t fathom why someone might want to hide perfectly acceptable parts of their identity?

        This would basically disallow any closeted gay/trans person from ever running for office, for example. People deserve their privacy.