genocide means dead. there is no coming back from that.
Holy damn, is your entire position based on you not understanding people are exaggerating?!? I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
What percentage of Palestinians do you think will be around after either presidency? (I mean, even if the PLO is undercounting by half, that’s 100,000 dead Palestineans in one year. Given there are more than 5 million Palestineans, well I’d say you can do the math but I’m not sure of that, so to give you a hand, that would be 50 more years of conflict at this pace before there are no more…)
And if you are actually a parody account (please be a parody, please be a parody) goddamn, well played!
Well I’ll grant you this is a new approach from someone… lets see how it works out for you.
So as long as its slow enough you’re okay with genocide? thats your argument? well as long as they only kill 300/day we’ll just let it slide. if they die from starvation, dehydration, disease, well that’s definitely unrelated to our activities! I mean I guess this approach has worked.
You’re also okay with israel killing journalists, WHO staff, UN staff, etc?
Agreed, hopefully she doesn’t lose. But if she does the dem twits only have themselves to blame. It means there would be a 30ish pt shift to 3rd party candidates in my state for that to happen. I can only dream of Americans becoming that morally aware.
Holy damn, is your entire position based on you not understanding people are exaggerating?!? I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
What percentage of Palestinians do you think will be around after either presidency? (I mean, even if the PLO is undercounting by half, that’s 100,000 dead Palestineans in one year. Given there are more than 5 million Palestineans, well I’d say you can do the math but I’m not sure of that, so to give you a hand, that would be 50 more years of conflict at this pace before there are no more…)
And if you are actually a parody account (please be a parody, please be a parody) goddamn, well played!
Well I’ll grant you this is a new approach from someone… lets see how it works out for you.
So as long as its slow enough you’re okay with genocide? thats your argument? well as long as they only kill 300/day we’ll just let it slide. if they die from starvation, dehydration, disease, well that’s definitely unrelated to our activities! I mean I guess this approach has worked.
You’re also okay with israel killing journalists, WHO staff, UN staff, etc?
Good to know.
Harris would end her term with fewer dead Palestinians than trump would.
That is a good thing.
Enabling trump leads to more Palestinians dying than would die if Harris was President.
That is a bad thing.
Agreed, hopefully she doesn’t lose. But if she does the dem twits only have themselves to blame. It means there would be a 30ish pt shift to 3rd party candidates in my state for that to happen. I can only dream of Americans becoming that morally aware.
Okay, so at least you finally agree that Harris and trump are not the same. This is progress!
Now, if you understand that trump is worse, surely you must see how not helping Harris means you are making it more likely that more Palestinians die?
Removed by mod