“The body mass index has long been criticized as a flawed indicator of health. A replacement has been gaining support: the body roundness index.” Article unfortunately doesn’t give the freaking formula for chrissakes; it’s “364.2 − 365.5 × √(1 − [waist circumference in centimeters / 2π]2 / [0.5 × height in centimeters]2), according to the formula developed by Thomas et al.10”

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    30 days ago

    Don’t Americans deal with differences smaller than 1 inch when it comes to height, is it just 2 footies 7 incherinos? I’m so used to it being per cm.

    Tbh I’ve never before seen a dropdown selector for height before either. It’s always just fill in thing.

      • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        30 days ago

        Partial inches are only used by people insecure about their height. “I’m 5’7.25” “, naw bud, you’re 5’7”.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          30 days ago

          I was thinking that this was a bit like with age. Someone telling you online that they’re “25 and a half”, yeah I bet you are lol.

          But to me 3cm difference especially in this sort of calculations just seems surprisingly big.

          • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            In imperial, it’s in one-inch increments, which is typical. Must have been written in inches and translated for the rest of the world.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Maybe to a half inch, but it’s not super popular (except for kids who ALWAYS are proud of that half inch they grew in x period of time). At least, that was the case before I moved to the sanity of metricland.