• fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Someone wearing socks and nothing else is still very naked.

    As a police officer explained the other day, nakedness is generally based on whether your “rude bits” are visible.

    He also explained that a cafe/bar offering a “bottomless brunch” should be thought of as “like a bottomless pit of drink and food - endless refills” rather than “akin to a topless beach, where you fully undress one half of your body”.

    • Klear@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Someone wearing socks and nothing else is still very naked.

      I feel more naked with just socks on than when wearing nothing at all.

    • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Obviously, it’s purely feelings based not rooted in legality. Without socks, but fully clothed, i feel more naked and exposed than with socks, but naked otherwise.

      Though it can be easily solved with an extra sock on a tactical location.