• coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s the point. You cost them money, because streaming is really expensive and skipping or blocking ads doesn’t make money.

    The moment I was presented with an ad-blocker notification by YouTube, I subscribed to Premium. I won’t watch ads. If it gets too expensive I’ll quit.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          In many ways, yes absolutely. By being a mindless consumer “just buying a product”, you leave it up to the balancing of the economy to determine if that is a wise decision or not.

          Last I checked, giving a rich person even more money is always a stupid move.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not a mindless consumer (aka sheeple) for making a decision someone else doesn’t approve of.

            The alternatives to YouTube Premium are

            • Ads: won’t happen

            • Ad-Block: won’t work (anymore)

            • no YouTube: there are no great free or cheaper alternatives

            • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The end of YouTube would not be a terrible outcome. Instead of a worldwide monopoly on DIY video, new and perhaps less evil options would have a chance.