SenK@lemmy.cadeleted by creator to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 3 months agoPeople who reject challenging ideas as stupid without engagement are like intellectual nepobabiesmessage-squaremessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1218arrow-down123file-text
arrow-up1195arrow-down1message-squarePeople who reject challenging ideas as stupid without engagement are like intellectual nepobabiesSenK@lemmy.cadeleted by creator to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square106linkfedilinkfile-text
Inheriting their worldview from consensus or comfort, never having to earn it through actual thought.
minus-squarepresoak@lazysoci.aldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 months agoIt’s bad because it MIGHT be used as a low-effort defense?
minus-squareSpiffyPotato@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoAlmost, the two parts that make it problematic to me are: It can be used used as a low-effort defence The defence is a personal attack
minus-squarepresoak@lazysoci.aldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·3 months agoAh, actually The defence CAN BE INTERPRETED AS a personal attack. That gate has 2 locks.
It’s bad because it MIGHT be used as a low-effort defense?
Almost, the two parts that make it problematic to me are:
Ah, actually
The defence CAN BE INTERPRETED AS a personal attack.
That gate has 2 locks.