• northendtrooper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    IIRC daylight savings was created way back when electricity really didn’t exist so it allowed the farmers more daylight to harvest their crops.

    Now with that said there is more technology in today’s farming equipment so DST shouldn’t really exist anymore.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not about the crops, farmers work by the sun, not by the clock.

      It was able conserving candles and oil, for lighting rooms.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So, this is wrong on so many levels. First of all, DST had nothing to do with farmers, it was to save energy usage in the summer as people were doing more things when the evenings were warmer.

      IIRC daylight savings was created way back when electricity really didn’t exist so it allowed the farmers more daylight to harvest their crops.

      DST does not increase the amount of daylight on any specific day of the year, it just shifts it later in the day so that people in 8-5 jobs can do more things after work. Farmers don’t work 8-5, they work as needed so if the crops need harvesting they will get harvested based on the weather.

      Now with that said there is more technology in today’s farming equipment so DST shouldn’t really exist anymore.

      Nowadays farmers have lots of lights and can harvest after the sun goes down, but that has nothing to do with why DST shouldn’t exist. DST shouldn’t exist because it doesn’t save energy due to any populated place having their lights on all night and the actual changing of time leading to negative outcomes like deaths from accidents with no benefits.

      Sure, the sun will come up earlier and set later in the summer if we get rid of DST, but the only reason for the time change in the first place was the standard working hours being longer after noon than before.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And you’d think *if anything farmers would want more sunlight in the morning when it’s cooler.

        Edited because people want to take this the wrong way. As in this another reason that DST and farmers makes no sense.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Farmers don’t care about clocks unless they are scheduling a time to meet and using the clock for clarity.

          The sun comes up when it comes up and that is what matters. Farmers don’t care about the clock for what they consider morning, because morning is before the sun is highest in the aky. They are already getting up a few minutes earlier or later depending on whether the days are getting longer or shorter.

          DST has nothing to do with farmers.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I think you misread my comment. It’s along the lines of if anything they would prefer the morning.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                This is besides what I was saying, which was again “if anything” and adding another reason why farmers and DST makes no sense. But dude people live in the world. Farmers are not 1000% in their own bubble. They need to go out to stores and get supplies and interact with the world and the supply chain. You are now taking lack of an office schedule or something to a ludicrous degree with your analogy. I wasn’t even disagreeing with your old points, I was saying “if anything” and adding another reason, but you want to go off on seemingly everyone. Perhaps you’re confusing me with the other guy, but whatever. Cheers.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Why add something irrelevant about something irrelevant?

                  Has anyone asked Ja Rule about DST? How do you think DST impacts Ja Rule’s travel plans while on tour?

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Actually DST was a war world one thing to save energy. To not need lighting in the factory.

        Look it up you’re both wrong.

        It actually was only active during WWI and WW2 until late 60s or early 70s (oil crunch may have brought it back.)

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Originally being started for WWI and WWII doesn’t contradict my post which talks about the current reasons given to keep it and that it is not saving energy now.

      • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My understanding is DST did still save appreciable energy until we replaced incandescent lights with fluorescent and leds. Longer daylight in the evening when people are awake and less in the early morning when people are asleep means lights aren’t being used as much. The average light bulb used to consume 60 watts or more and also let off significant undesirable heat, so with a house full of lights DST really did cut back energy usage. Now though with led lights low consumption and virtually no heat, it’s not nearly as significant.

      • azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        and set earlier in the summer*

        I hate it. I fucking hate it. With every fiber of my being. I spend every winter counting the days until the sun stops setting before I stop working. Our entire lives are scheduled so we are inside under neon light from 9-6, why are we trying to maximize how much of that is during daytime?

        On the day that we go back to permanent ST I will turn to hard drugs to make up for the dopamine deficiency. No joke very few things in my life fill me with more dread than having to suffer early evenings for the rest of my life.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Maybe, and hear me out, the problem is that 9 to 6 is the problem, since 2/3 of that time is after noon. Instead of changing reality to appease business, business, work hours could be changed to 8 to 4 with four before and four after which is both more light in the evening than DST and a shorter workday because people are more productive than they ever have been.

          But I guess you would rather let business practices determine when noon is for everyone instead of the sun.

          • azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Business hours is no more or less of a social construct than DST or the 24 hour clock.

            The only difference is that we have a shot at making everyone agree on a timezone shift or permanent DST, but absolutely NO SHOT at getting every business to switch to an 8-4 schedule. None. It’d be a nice sentiment. But it’s not happening, and I don’t care what the number says on the clock when I leave work as long as it’s sunny outside.

            Why is it so important that the sun reaches its zenith at noon anyway? Do you often get confused while looking at your antique sundial?

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              First of all, noon refers to when the sun is at the highest point in the sky so being an hour off is confusing.

              Being able to look at the general position of the sun and being able to estimate time is pretty handy.

              Being able to estimate the length of day because the time between sunrise and sunset being approximately the same is handy.

              Not changing the time of day twice a year would be fucking fantastic.

              Some places already stick with standard time all year round.

              The US tried year round DST in the 70s and it was widely rejected within a year because DST during the winter is fucking awful.

              Plus, most jobs don’t mind people coming in and leaving early, which is a far more common shift adjustment than coming in and staying late.

              Year round standard time is the real solution.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a misconception. Farmers lobbied heavily against DST. Their work does not abide by the clock; they milk when cows need milking, and they harvest when there’s enough light, no matter what some clock says.

      In Europe, DST as we know it now was first introduced by Germany during WW1 to preserve coal, then abandoned after the war, and widely adopted again in the 70s. In the US it was established federally in the 60s.

      This is all glossing over a lot of regional differences and older history. But yeah, US farmers were very much against the idea.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I blame Big Ice Cream™.

        Those ice cream trucks get an additional hour of daylight to hawk their goods before the children are recalled back inside for supper.