- cross-posted to:
- Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world
Buried in a habeas petition that Maxwell recently filed in court, hoping to void her conviction, the convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein references four potential “co-conspirators” and “25 men” who allegedly reached “secret settlements” connected to Epstein’s abuse—and were never indicted
A rule of journalism: When a news headline includes words like blasts, blisters, bombshell, burns, claps back, drags, epic self-own, explodes, freaks out, goes nuclear, goes viral, humbles, humiliates, melts down, mind-blowing, rages, rips, roasts, shocking, skewers, slams, staggers, stuns, trends online, or trolls, find a better source. The only exception is when the word is used literally, i.e., a bombshell *actually explodes.
Now I’ll add ‘grenade’ to the list.
Two days later the rest of the press begins to pick it up:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15510049/Stunning-Epstein-twist-Ghislaine-Maxwell-claims-29-friends-cut-secret-deals-DOJ.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/stunning-epstein-twist-as-ghislaine-maxwell-claims-29-friends-cut-secret-deals-with-doj/ar-AA1Vgnmj
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2026/01/29/epstein-associates-shielded-us-government-maxwell/
Feel free to find a better source and post it
Cordially, if it’s news, it’ll make its way to a serious news site.
With respect, if all you can add is criticism maybe you have nothing to add.