cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agotimeoutSortlemmy.mlimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1451arrow-down14cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1447arrow-down1imagetimeoutSortlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square35linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareptu@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoSo all items in the array are launched simultaneuously and ran in parallel instead of sequentially?
minus-squarescrion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoThey are launched sequentially, but run simultaneously, yes - at least some of them. And they run concurrently but not in parallel - using a single execution context, there is only a single thread, so no parallelism exist.
So all items in the array are launched simultaneuously and ran in parallel instead of sequentially?
They are launched sequentially, but run simultaneously, yes - at least some of them. And they run concurrently but not in parallel - using a single execution context, there is only a single thread, so no parallelism exist.