• protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Who a government shutdown would hurt and what difference it would make are certainly up for debate. A lot of knee-jerk reactions on here…but genuinely, what do y’all think is going to be accomplished by shutting down the government?

    • Airowird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      For one, non-voters would suddenly a Republican-lead Congress fail to fund the government.

      Secondly, it throws a spanner in the DOGE arguments of wasteful spending, because they wouldn’t be spending at all and people would be negatively impacted by it.

      Lastly, the “it would give Trump all the power” argument sucks, because he already has it. Congress isn’t (openly) fighting his abuse of EOs, they’re effectively allow him to be a dictator. A tangerine tyrant, if you will.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Your first statement is questionable, voters decidedly punished Republicans for shutting down the government as the minority party in the past. I think a shutdown would give Trump the cover to blame everything that’s about to go wrong with the economy on the Democrats, and I don’t think it’s a good idea.