• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Hitler got about 33% back when he started. He achieved his position by simply ignoring the law after that. Sounds familiar?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      So they reformed the state after ww2, right?

      No such change here. People literally swear their lives to “defending” the olde slavermaster pact.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They basically overhauled the politicla landscape completely. Actually, the allies installed a parliamentary system that fixed most issues of the German, British, and US system, and it has worked quite well, better than the originals.

        • tischbier@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think you’re on to something. Presidential Republics are inherently unstable. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that South Korea is facing similar issues to America and both have Presidential systems.

          After this settles if we aren’t all fighting in anarcho-capitalist communes, America might consider similar structural reform and consider a Prime Minister style of bicameralism (but they can call it President instead).

          You make a good point and it’s a hopeful one