The payment was made just before everything got DOGEd
It was a valid payment, not made in error. They decided after the fact that they didn’t like the valid payment, and reversed it. This likely involved fraud, because that’s not a valid reason to reverse a payment.
You’re glossing over the most important word:
It was a valid payment, not made in error. They decided after the fact that they didn’t like the valid payment, and reversed it. This likely involved fraud, because that’s not a valid reason to reverse a payment.
Not a valid reason according to who? The monkeys are running the circus now. There are no rules.
Well, DOGE would totally say “No U” and assert that the program was fraudulent in the first place, because they don’t agree with it politically.