FishFace

That they seriously consider step porn as worse than murder shows that it is all about control and not about morals.

No, it shows their morals are different than yours (and mine).

my innocent eyes x_x

mods delet this

Are you asking why Qt’s main target is the desktop, rather than mobile?

What other kinds of games are there where you can hear what the losers are yelling?

We need more info

Tortoises are land animals. Simple.

Frogs and toads might be a better one - there’s no systematic difference except toads are ugly.

I think it became popular because you can deliver the same app to mobile and desktop platforms. And because js gave people a very easy intro to development on the web so tons of people know it.

I don’t think it became popular because it was better at making an application on a single target. I’ve never made a webapp with the equivalent of GLADE or QtCreator so I don’t know if it even exists - but those tools are very decent if you had a basic understanding of UI layout.

Can’t speak to your specific example but I have 100% heard people say “had an accent” to mean “has a regional accent”, that would include, for example, an Appalachian accent.

What RT interfaces do electron apps let you use ;)

I’m confused why Qt Creator wasn’t available - is this project old enough to vote or was there some technical reason :P

Not necessarily. People who say “he has an accent” just think that their accent is “not an accent” so it could also be a (different) regional accent.

Writing stuff in a proper gui framework using the tools we’ve had for decades is not really that bad, it’s just not what all the tutorials are for. CSS can be an absolute pig to get things just so, or was until quite recently.

Everyone has an accent!

That is far from agreed upon. A popular view is that neither the atomic bomb alone, nor the Soviet invasion of Manchuria alone, would have caused Japan to surrender when it did.

Yeah peanut butter is delicious

Damn, need a red arrow pointing to the red text!

Glad someone added the red text, otherwise I wouldn’t know what to laugh at

It should fundamentally be deliberately stupid. It could be offensive, but if so it should be offensive in a stupid way.

Betting markets aggregate the opinion of people who make bets on them, weighted according to how much they bet. They are not an estimate of the likelihood of an event happening. This is a common misconception about how they work.

If they took bets from a representative sample of society and everyone bet the same amount, it’d be an aggregate opinion of the public, which is a pretty good way of trying to estimate such likelihoods (using the Wisdom of the Crowd principle) but this is not what they do.

I don’t believe I did. I was always talking about whether it was necessary to offer incentives to do jobs like waste collection or if they’d be done anyway in an ideal society.